The Money Minute
Subscribe
Cover photo

What Happens if Amber Heard Can't Afford Her Judgment?

Not many people have $10.35 million dollars lying around, but the big question is: does Amber Heard? And if not, what happens?

Nicole Lapin

Jun 6
2
36

Last week, the highly anticipated verdict came down from the Amber Heard-Johnny Depp trial. The jury found that both parties, Amber Heard and Johnny Depp, were guilty of defaming each other. But by following the money trail, it is clear that the jury felt Heard’s actions were more damaging to Depp, than the other way around.

Initially, Depp was awarded $15 million, but the Judge reduced the sentence to $10.35 million. Amber Heard was awarded $2 million in damages— less than one fifth of what Johnny got.

Depp’s case had sought $50 million in damages— and $10.35 million is not $50 million, but it’s still a lot of money. Not many people have $10.35 million lying around, but the big question is: does Amber Heard? And this got me thinking: what happens, legally, if Amber Heard can’t pay?

This is not an unlikely scenario. I’ve reported on some clues that Heard has have hit some financial speed bumps. I mentioned this in my last article on this case, but in case you missed it, here’s a refresher. When Amber Heard and Johnny Depp settled their divorce, Depp was ordered to pay Heard $7 million. Heard stated that she would donate the money from the settlement to the division of the ACLU that combats violence against women and the Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles. However, the ACLU made an official statement saying that did not happen.

The ACLU was expecting $3.5 million from Amber, but to-date, they’ve received about half of that. An official from the ACLU said that they reached out to Amber in 2019 to ask about the next installment of her giving, and she reported that she was having financial difficulties.

The question of Amber Heard’s financial means is no longer speculative: Amber’s attorney Elaine Bredehoft told People Magazine that Heard can not pay the judgment payment— and, by the way, “judgment payment” is the proper name for the sum of money a defendant has to pay. Doesn’t that term just sound as scary as it is? Anyway, Amber’s attorney also mentioned that Amber had paid more than $6 million in legal costs. That’s almost the entire amount that she was awarded in the divorce.

So, we know in no uncertain terms that Amber Heard can’t pay the judgment payment, so what does that mean for her? Typically, if someone has a debt they cannot pay, they will consider bankruptcy. We know this from Episode 28 of my podcast Money Rehab, Confessions of a Bankruptcy Lawyer. In that episode, we learned that when someone has a debt they cannot pay, bankruptcy can be a good option because it gives that person a clean, debt-free slate.

However, one type of debt that cannot be washed away with bankruptcy is debt incurred during, and I’m quoting here “willful and malicious injury by the debtor to another entity.”

According to legal analyst Emily D. Baker: “the willful element of defamation that had to be found because they're celebrities — takes it out of the possibility of bankruptcy because it was a willful act."

In other words, even if Amber Heard files for bankruptcy, she’d still be required to pay Johnny Depp the $10.35 million, because she was found guilty of willful injury.

So with bankruptcy ruled out, what are her options? There are two major ones:

  1. She could negotiate the payment. There is an opportunity for Amber and Johnny to come to a settlement that is feasible for Amber.

  2. She could try to appeal the judgment. This is what Amber’s lawyer says they are working on now.

If the appeal fails, Johnny would have the right to get the money from Amber by seizing her property or getting a court to legally withhold her future wages, and essentially reroute them to Johnny’s bank account.

But, I don’t see Johnny Depp getting that aggressive. First and foremost, he said that this case was about his reputation, not the money. If he meant that, he’s already gotten what he wanted, and he may not feel the need to enforce the sentence.

But, more than that, I think the actual reason he will not actively pursue settling the debt, is that it would look bad for him.

While, yes, Depp can say that he got what he wanted in a court of law, it’s not totally clear if he got what he wanted in the court of public opinion. Many news organizations have made the distinction that even though Johnny got the verdict he wanted, he didn’t necessarily clear his name. After all, he was found guilty of defaming Amber Heard.

Plus, while the internet was certainly “Team Johnny,” not everyone was. There are still some people that contend he is an abuser. If he’s trying to win back his reputation, driving his ex-wife into homelessness probably won't achieve his desired result. Not to mention, that there are still Amber’s outstanding payments to the ACLU, and the more she spends on her debt to Johnny, the longer it will take for her to make good on her promised donation. I am confident that Johnny Depp doesn’t want it to be publicized that he is getting the money that was promised to an organization that deals with domestic abuse.

My prediction is that Depp won’t pursue the full payment, simply because it would look bad for him. And this whole lawsuit was about not looking bad anymore, right?

xo,

Do you want to get rid of debt, lock in that raise, plan for your best retired life, find unclaimed money and generally cruise along the road to financial freedom? Here are more ways to get it together and get it all:

🎙Click here to subscribe here to my daily financial advice podcast, Money Rehab.

📖 Click here to order my latest book, Miss Independent.

👶 Is a mini-me on your horizon? Level up with a Rich Mom premium subscription.Subscribers will get enriching bonus content like cheat sheets, exclusive articles, reader questions, a new community hub for mommies and mommies-to-be. Invest in yourself— and your family— and hit subscribe to check out your new favorite place on the internet.

Subscribe to The Money Minute
By subscribing, you agree to share your email address with Nicole Lapin to receive their original content, including promotions. Unsubscribe at any time. Meta will also use your information subject to the Bulletin Terms and Policies
2
36

More from The Money Minute
See all

The Cost of Reversing Roe v. Wade

Often this topic gets shoehorned into a partisan argument: pro-life Republicans versus pro-choice Democrats. But I want to bring in a perspective that transcends politics: financial freedom.
May 9
13
55

Save on Gas With These Tips

For the last two plus years, we’ve been cooped up at home because of the pandemic. Now, there’s a new force keeping us inside: gas prices.
Jun 8
5
6

8 Ways to Save $$$ at the Grocery Store

Food is a critical expense; you need it to survive… and that’s what makes it such a sneaky financial blindspot.
Jun 20
3
10
Comments
Log in with Facebook to comment

36 Comments

  • Serina Rieckman
    Ridiculous. There's literally thousands of people everywhere in jail because they can't pay the settlement. What happens when Jamal can't pay? He goes to jail and or his wages are garnished. Mr. Depp reputation is forever stained by her statements. 8 m…
    See more
    • 2w
    • Author
      Nicole Lapin
      Thanks for reading, Serina! This article was about what happens if she doesn't have the money to pony up, not whether or not the sentence was fair. That's a whole other conversation!
      • 2w
    View 3 more replies
  • Larry Green
    What an off base article. ‘Johnny Depp did not necessarily clear his name’. Really? Ok let’s go back to the basics sir. The jury found that Heard’s claims of abuse were lies. eg he cleared his name.
    The fact that the jury found defamation on one of t…
    See more
    • 2w
    • Edited
  • Steven Dixon
    Since it was a civil trial and not a criminal trial it’s a judgment not a sentence.
    2
    • 2w
  • Bobbi Jo Arnold
    If you think JD hasn't won over (actually he never really lost them to begin with) his TRUE fans and just about ALL public opinions and his good reputation I sure would like to know what trial your basing your dumb article on because it sure as heck wa…
    See more
    • 2w
    • Author
      Nicole Lapin
      Hey Bobbi! I would have totally engaged with you on this topic, but name-calling isn't a way to have this conversation.
      • 2w
    View 1 more reply
  • Terry Rucker
    They say you can’t get blood from a turnip but you can throw that turnips but in jail!
    She’ll look okay in Orange!!!!!!!
    • 2w
  • Shawn Gilliam
    I agree that it may look bad but not on Johnny he didn't make promises that he couldn't keep that was her and as far as the public sees the public can't even pull their own head out of their butts and get off drugs and quit fighting each other for the …
    See more
    • 2w
  • Terry Rucker
    But yet she paid $22.6 k for a house to live in while the trial was going on!
    • 2w
  • Frank Osbourne
    Am I wrong, didn’t aclu help her write the article that started this whole mess?
    • 2w
    1 Reply
  • April Giroux
    That's her problem.
    • 2w
  • Ashok Kumar Gupta
    That's her problem
    • 2w
View 11 more comments
Share quoteSelect how you’d like to share below
Share on Facebook
Share to Twitter
Send in Whatsapp
Share on Linkedin
Privacy  ·  Terms  ·  Cookies
© Meta 2022
Discover fresh voices. Tune into new conversations. Browse all publications